When: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 14:00 CEST / 13:00 WEST & BST / 8:00 A.M. ET Where: MPI Europe Webinar Speakers: Michael Kegels, Director of Operational Services, Fedasil Belgium Jamil Addou, Coordinator of the Quality Division, Centre for Training, Quality, and Expertise, European Asylum and Support Office Karoline Preisser, Legal Expert, Department for Basic and Federal Care, Federal Ministry of the Interior, Austria Moderator: Hanne Beirens, Associate Director, Migration Policy Institute Europe The pressure brought by the recent mass influx of migrants and refugees to Europe has drawn attention to the need for systems to receive and house new arrivals that can adapt to unpredictable numbers, remain cost-efficient, and meet national and EU standards. But what does it take to set up and manage a reception system that can simultaneously meet the demands of flexibility, quality, and efficiency? While countries such as Greece, Germany, and Sweden continue to strive to find enough basic accommodation for newcomers, others, such as Finland, have announced a major scaling back of (underused) facilities. Still others have opted to cap the number of asylum seekers registered daily to maintain minimum standards. Yet, there may be strength in such different approaches. EU Member States may benefit from cooperating with each other—and actors such as the European Asylum Support Office (EASO)—to pool expertise and experiences, and create economies of scale. Such cooperation may have added benefits: creating habits of working together can help build the trust and confidence needed for a political breakthrough in other areas of asylum policy. Michael Kegels, Fedasil Belgium’s Director of Operational Services and author of the recent MPI Europe report, Getting the Balance Right: Strengthening Asylum Reception Capacity at National and EU Levels, will discuss how to devise a more responsive asylum reception system at national and EU levels that upholds common standards. He will be joined by representatives from the Austrian Ministry of Interior and EASO to reflect on the practical challenges of meeting asylum-seeker reception demand, the prospects of greater cooperation, and the place of asylum reception policy at the heart of the Common European Asylum System.